Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884444›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2025

Functional/dissociative seizures: Proposal for a new diagnostic label and definition by the ILAE task force.

Coraline Hingray, Stoyan Popkirov, Kasia Kozlowska, Chrisma Pretorius, Mercedes Sarudiansky, Wissam El-Hage, Dong Zhou, Deniz Ertan, LaFrance Wc, Markus Reuber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Coraline HingrayUniversité de Lorraine, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Ingénierie Moléculaire, Cellulaire et Physiopathologie, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-3310
Stoyan PopkirovDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kasia KozlowskaChildren's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Chrisma PretoriusStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Mercedes SarudianskySchool of Psychology, National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina/University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-2231
Wissam El-HageUniversité de Tours, INSERM, Imaging Brain & Neuropsychiatry, U1253, Tours, France.
Dong ZhouWest China School of Medicine/West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-4125
Deniz ErtanLa Teppe Institute, Clinical Research Unit, Tain l'Hérmitage, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1108-6482
LaFrance WcVA Providence Healthcare System, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, VA Mind Brain Program, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-3852
Markus ReuberDepartment of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
ILAE Functional/Dissociative Seizures Task Force

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acceptability and validity of the term "psychogenic nonepileptic seizures" (PNES) have been questioned. Currently, numerous alternative terms, such as "conversion," "dissociative," "functional," "attacks," and "events," are used in both medical literature and clinical practice, leading to confusion among professionals and patients. The lack of a uniform diagnostic label is likely to impede research funding and service development. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Psychiatry Commission charged its task force focusing on these seizures to propose a more uniform and integrative terminology. Members of the previous ILAE PNES Task Force (2017-2021) helped to organize two workshops to try to build a consensus for a new terminology. These meetings involved experts by experience, clinicians, and researchers, including representatives of the Functional Neurological Disorders Society (an international professional organization), FND Hope (an international patient advocacy organization), and the American Epilepsy Society. The current task force (2021-2025) continued this work by reviewing the existing literature and debating the nomenclature and classification of seizures commonly labeled as PNES. The present proposal paper synthesizes the findings of this process. Based on our critical consideration of the literature, academic insights, and clinical experience, and noting the current international medical and psychiatric classification systems, the ILAE task force proposes the new term "functional/dissociative seizures" (FDS). This proposal paper explores the pros and cons of each component of the label "functional," "dissociative," and "seizure" from different perspectives, taking account of patient and health care professional acceptability, diagnostic and semiological considerations, underlying illness mechanisms, treatment provision, and health-economic, sociocultural, and linguistic factors. The dual characterization and use of a slash offer clinicians flexibility to adopt either "functional" or "dissociative," or both, in their practice depending on the patient's profile, their own preferences, and the cultural/linguistic context. The abbreviation "FDS" is recommend for use in scientific writings.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesDissociative DisordersSeizuresTerminology as TopicEpilepsyHumansdissociative disorderfunctional neurological disorderneurologynomenclaturepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID40884444
PMCPMC12661283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.