Trial reportJAMA cardiology2025
High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the DANFLU-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05517174 (A Pragmatic Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pragmatic Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The benefits of influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- High-dose vs. standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine and cardiovascular outcomes in persons with or without pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the DANFLU-2 trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Influenza Vaccination as Cardiovascular Prevention in Adults with Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- High-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older adults with or without cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials on 511,890 participants.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Review
- Improving Heart Failure Quality of Care Over the First Twenty Years: The Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Program.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The FLUNITY-HD Prespecified Pooled Analysis.Circulation · 2026Article
- Potential Non-Specific Benefits of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination: Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Directions.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Influenza vaccination reduces hospitalization and improves heart failure outcomes.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Article
- Risk of Myocarditis or Pericarditis With High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the Randomized DANFLU-2 Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection vs standard-dose IIV (SD-IIV); however, data regarding its effectiveness against cardiovascular (CV) outcomes are mainly from observational studies or specific high-risk groups. Objective: To investigate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV against CV outcomes in the general older adult population in Denmark. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of DANFLU-2, a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized clinical trial (RCT) using nationwide administrative health registries in Denmark during the 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons. Older adults (age ≥65 years) were eligible for inclusion regardless of comorbidity. The trial design specified that if the primary end point was neutral, no hypothesis testing would be performed for secondary or exploratory end points. Data were analyzed from June 29 to August 12, 2025. Interventions: Individual-level 1:1 randomization to HD-IIV or SD-IIV. Participants re-enrolling in additional seasons were rerandomized. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe CV outcomes were prespecified secondary and exploratory end points in the trial, occurring from 14 days after vaccination through May 31 the following year. Results: A total of 332 438 participants (170 900 [51.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 73.7 [5.8] years) were randomized (166 218 to HD-IIV and 166 220 to SD-IIV), of whom 91 026 (27.4%) had a history of CV disease. HD-IIV did not significantly reduce the trial's primary end point of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia. The incidence of hospitalization for any cardiorespiratory disease was lower in the HD-IIV group than the SD-IIV group (rVE, 5.7% [95% CI, 1.4% to 9.9%]; absolute difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.24 to -0.03] percentage points), and rVE did not differ by history of CV disease compared with no CV disease at baseline. Hospitalization for any CV disease occurred in fewer participants in the HD-IIV group than the SD-IIV group (rVE, 7.5% [95% CI, 1.5% to 12.5%]; absolute difference, -0.10 [95% CI, -0.18 to -0.02] percentage points) as did hospitalization for heart failure (rVE, 19.5% [95% CI, 3.3% to 33.1%]; absolute difference, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01] percentage points). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found reduced incidence of cardiorespiratory hospitalization among those who received HD-IIV vs SD-IIV, driven by a lower incidence of CV hospitalizations, and particularly heart failure hospitalizations. These differences should be interpreted as exploratory findings in the setting of a large RCT with a neutral primary outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05517174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.