Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884085›Full record

ArticleLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2025

Diagnostic and Clinical Implications of High Spleen-To-Liver Stiffness Ratio in MASH-A Prospective, Comparative Study.

Christian Sebesta, Mathias Jachs, Lukas Hartl, Michael Schwarz, Lorenz Balcar, Benedikt S Hofer, Nina Dominik, Georg Kramer, Bernhard Scheiner, Albert F Stättermayer and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic and Clinical Implications of High Spleen-To-Liver Stiffness Ratio in MASH-A Prospective, Comparative Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christian SebestaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0001-7504-8506
Mathias JachsDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-4147
Lukas HartlDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3398-6120
Michael SchwarzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lorenz BalcarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-3061
Benedikt S HoferDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3403-3372
Nina DominikDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0009-4615-915X
Georg KramerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0008-1736-3699
Bernhard ScheinerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Albert F StättermayerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benedikt SimbrunnerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8181-9146
Till SchöchtnerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Friedrich HaimbergerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicolas BalutschDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael TraunerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mattias MandorferDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-0017
Thomas ReibergerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David J M BauerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9363-8518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver stiffness measurement (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) represent non-invasive surrogates of portal hypertension (PH) that both correlate with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). SSM may overcome limitations of HVPG and LSM in detecting presinusoidal PH components. We investigated the SSM/LSM ratio as a PH surrogate and its relationship to HVPG and spleen diameter across different liver disease aetiologies.

methods399 consecutive patients with compensated liver disease undergoing same-day measurement of HVPG, LSM and SSM were prospectively included.

resultsWhile patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD; n = 200) showed higher LSM (median: 45.5 kPa) and HVPG (15.0 mmHg) than patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; n = 49; LSM: 20.9 kPa; HVPG: 12.0 mmHg), their SSM (median: 58.8 vs. 52.8 kPa; p = 0.868) was not significantly different. Consequently, the SSM/LSM ratio was higher in MASH (1.66) vs. ALD (1.28), but highest in patients with non-cirrhotic PH (3.19). When adjusting for HVPG, SSM and spleen diameter remained significantly higher in MASH than in ALD at any given HVPG.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that SSM/LSM ratios vary across different liver disease aetiologies. Since MASH patients-after adjusting for liver disease severity-show higher SSM/LSM ratios and larger spleen diameters than ALD, our results support the concept of a presinusoidal component of PH in MASH patients.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesFatty LiverHypertension, PortalLiverSpleenAdultAgedFemaleHumansLiver Diseases, AlcoholicMaleMiddle AgedPortal PressureProspective StudiesAIXPLOREcirrhosisliver stiffnessspleen stiffnessSSM/LSM‐ ratio

Identifiers

PMID40884085
PMCPMC12397721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.