Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40884066›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

We have liftoff: A discovery study to use artificial intelligence to identify adaptative profiles for future space missions.

Barbara Le Roy, Damien Claverie, Lucas Sauvadet, Charles Martin-Krumm, Marion Trousselard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara Le RoyHuman Adaptation Institute, Marseille, France.
Damien ClaverieStress Neurophysiology Unit, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Lucas SauvadetPony Industries, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Charles Martin-KrummStress Neurophysiology Unit, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Marion TrousselardHuman Adaptation Institute, Marseille, France.

Funding

CNES 4800001159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-duration space missions will challenge astronauts' adaptive capacities. Interoception and heart rate variability (HRV), reflecting parasympathetic activity, are increasingly recognized as predictors of adaptation and health. This study investigated whether artificial intelligence may predict adaptation profiles from interoceptive and HRV responses accross different space analogs. Data were collected from 84 participants in four environments: parabolic flight, nuclear submarine, sea survival simulation, and chemical/biological hazard exercises. Interoceptive sensitivity and HRV were measured to identify adaptation profiles using clustering. Baseline data were then used to train a support vector machine (SVM) to predict these profiles. Three adaptation profiles emerged, differing in interoceptive awareness, body-mind integration, and neuroception. The SVM model predicted these profiles with 79% accuracy. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using machine learning to anticipate adaptation outcomes based on physiological and interoceptive markers. They emphasize the embodied nature of adaptation and the relevance of interoceptive pathways in HRV dynamics. This work provides new directions for optimizing astronaut training by tailoring preparation to individual physiological profiles. Tomorrow is here, we are ready for take-off.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalArtificial IntelligenceAstronautsHeart RateSpace FlightAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector Machineadaptationclassificationhealthmachine learningspace analogs

Identifiers

PMID40884066
PMCPMC12397580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.