ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Putting a lid on it: The N-terminal helix of Arf1 inhibits switching via uniform stabilization.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Arf and Arf-like GTPases, unlike all other Ras family GTPase members, exhibit a repressed conformation in their inactive, GDP-bound form. An important component of this autoinhibition is their N-terminal helix, which is missing in the other Ras family members. This helix caps a switch element called the interswitch, confining it to this repressed state. Activation by GDP/GTP exchange is primed by the dissociation of the N-terminal helix from the core of the protein, which precedes a massive conformational change and binding of GTP. An important unanswered question is how the energetics of Arf-GDP is remodeled at the initial step of activation, permitting the GDP/GTP reaction to proceed. In cells, the helix is displaced through interaction with a membrane, an effect that can be mimicked in solution by truncation mutants. Here, we used Arf1Δ17, a construct in which the N-terminal helix was deleted, to map the local stability of Arf1-GDP using high-pressure biophysical approaches, which we compared to that of full-length Arf1. Remarkably, deletion of the N-terminal helix decreased Arf1 stability across the entire structure. Thus, rather than imposing a specific allosteric pathway for repression, the N-terminal helix exercises global control of Arf1 stability to repress switching. This has important implications for understanding the energetics basis of the cooperation of membranes and guanine nucleotide exchange factors in Arf and Arf-like proteins activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.