ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Enhancing patient stratification methods for medication review during acute admissions.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medication Burden: Beyond Counts to Recognize Polypharmacy as an Inherent Part of Living With Chronic Kidney Disease.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing and Associations With Patient-Related Factors Across Two Hospital Settings.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Enhancing patient stratification methods for medication review during acute admissions.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medication review in the hospital is an effective tool for identifying inappropriate prescribing, but not every patient can receive one due to resource constraints. Thus, it is important to identify patients who stand to benefit most from medication review. Patients are typically identified for medication review based on number of medications and age, but this may not be the most efficient strategy for identifying patients at high risk of future adverse clinical outcomes. In this exploratory study of 27 873 acutely admitted medical patients (≥18 years) at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark, we investigated whether other clinical factors could improve the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes and, therefore, be incorporated into patient stratification for medication review. The outcomes of interest were acute readmission or mortality within 90 days post-discharge. Medication risk score (MERIS), renal function and anticholinergic cognitive burden did not improve prediction of adverse clinical outcomes compared to number of medications and age. However, addition of a frailty index based on routine biomarkers (FI-OutRef) or plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) did improve prediction of outcomes. Use of these practical proxies of disease burden may improve the identification of acutely hospitalized patients who would benefit most from a medication review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.