Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883971›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Co-Producing Patient-Reported Experience Measures With People With Intellectual Disability to Improve Healthcare Quality and Outcomes: The 'Listen to Me' Project Protocol.

Reema Harrison, Bronwyn Newman, Beth Catlett, Laurel Mimmo, Ling Wu, Maya Tokutake, Karen Phillips, Matthew Van Hoek, Debbie Van Hoek, Elizabeth Manias and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Co-Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Reema HarrisonAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-9827
Bronwyn NewmanAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-7381
Beth CatlettAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-5391
Laurel MimmoAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Ling WuFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-6927
Maya TokutakeAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Karen PhillipsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Matthew Van HoekAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Debbie Van HoekAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-0087
Pandora PattersonCommunity First Step, Fairfield, Australia.
Dalal Dawood BaumgartnerSatb2Connect, Westfield, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6968-3168
Kim BowenSatb2Connect, Westfield, Australia.
Julian TrollorNational Centre of Intellectual Disability Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7685-2977
Sue WoolfendenSydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia.
Iva StrnadovaSchool of Education, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5400
Johanna WestbrookAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Rebecca MitchellAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1939-1761
Angela DewInstitute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8800-5660
Patrick OlivierFaculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2841-7580
Virginia MumfordAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Tim Badgery-ParkerAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-1130
Louise EllisAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Sophie RodierSafer Care Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Tracey SzantoNew South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-2211-1268
Jacqueline SmallSydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia.
Corey AdamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Michelle TempletonCentre for Developmental and Disability Health, Monash Health, Doveton, Australia.
Jane EvansSt Vincent's Health Australia, East Sydney, Australia.
Nadine A HacklBureau of Health Information, St Leonards, Australia.
Kate ChurrucaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Anne Marie HadleyNew South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Futures Fund (Grant-MRF2026313).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntellectual disability, defined by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviour with onset during the developmental period, affects an estimated 2% (108 million) of people worldwide. People with intellectual disability experience major health inequity, poor health outcomes and premature deaths, with mortality rates that are 7-12 times higher than the general population. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are used worldwide to target improvements in healthcare delivery. Yet, systematic review evidence confirms that people with intellectual disability are excluded from PREMs due to a lack of suitable measurement instruments and supports. To improve healthcare quality and outcomes, people with intellectual disability and their supporters, and academic and clinician researchers will together Coproduce PREMs for, and with, this population apply the PREM in hospitals and use the data to inform local quality improvement projects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our 3-year project employs a multi-method design using coproduction, underpinned by an implementation science framework. We will coproduce PREMs that will be applied to improve healthcare quality and outcomes for people with intellectual disability whilst engaging in co-research with people with lived experience of having an intellectual disability and their carers, clinicians and academic researchers. Study 1 will coproduce PREMs for use by people with intellectual disability to report their experiences of inpatient hospital care. Study 2 will use the co-produced PREMs to capture the experiences of people with intellectual disability as inpatients in Australian hospitals; determine PREMs reliability and validity; and costs associated with use. Study 3 will develop the required capability to translate our PREMs into hospitals across Australia. Study 4 will apply PREMs data via continuous quality improvement in partnering hospitals to reduce preventable healthcare associated harm, hospitalisation, and prolonged length of stay experienced by people with intellectual disability. Study 5 will provide a process evaluation of our co-research approach. Quantitative and qualitative analysis will be undertaken, and results will be examined against the project aims. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained (520241735259588; X24-0366; 115771). This study is being conducted with partner health agencies and services nationally in Australia to support achievement of the research aims and translation of findings into practice. Targeted outputs with research dissemination will be guided by, and in collaboration with, the project Consumer Leadership Group, consumer and health system stakeholders, with governance from the Project Steering Group. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The Listen to Me project has been designed and planned to ensure the involvement of people with a broad range of abilities, including those with profound intellectual disability who will be able to contribute along with their support person/s. The governance structure of Listen to Me is innovative and inclusive, with consumers providing leadership across all elements of the project. This is co-research conceptualised and conducted with a Consumer Leadership Group (CLG) comprising eight people with lived experiences of intellectual disability; two of whom have an intellectual disability and six of whom are parents or siblings who support family members with intellectual disability. The CLG were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocols, and the writing of this protocol as authors. The CLG will direct and contribute to all aspects of the research as part of the research team. An easy read summary of this protocol is provided in Supplementary file 1.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareAustraliaHumansResearch Designcodesignconsumer led researchhealthcare accesshealthcare equityhealthcare outcomesintellectual disabilitypatient experiencestudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID40883971
PMCPMC12397070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.