ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Transient Renal Artery Stenosis in Renal Infarction: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal infarction is a rare condition resulting from interruption of renal arterial blood flow. Its nonspecific presentation often mimics more common diagnoses such as nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis, or musculoskeletal pain, contributing to delayed or missed diagnosis. Early identification is essential to prevent irreversible renal damage and optimize patient outcomes. Imaging plays a critical role in both the initial diagnosis and in determining the underlying etiology, which may include thromboembolism, in-situ thrombosis, vascular injury, or hypercoagulable states. CASE REPORT We describe a case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, hormone replacement therapy, and a 42 pack-year smoking history, who presented with sudden-onset, severe left-flank pain. Initial laboratory results were nonspecific, with mild proteinuria and microscopic hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) angiography demonstrated severe stenosis of the superior left renal artery and extensive left renal infarction. A diagnosis of atherosclerotic renal infarction was made. She was treated with intravenous heparin, transitioned to dual antiplatelet therapy and high-intensity statin, and discharged with a 30-day cardiac event monitor. No arrhythmia was detected, and her thrombophilia workup was negative. Follow-up CT angiography 1 month later revealed complete resolution of the renal artery stenosis, with no residual narrowing or plaque. The transient nature of the vascular finding, along with the lack of structural atherosclerosis, prompted diagnostic reassessment, favoring an embolic mechanism possibly related to multiple modifiable prothrombotic clinical risk factors and unrecognized embolic sources. CONCLUSIONS This case illustrates the importance of follow-up imaging and clinical reassessment in differentiating embolic from atherosclerotic causes of renal infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.