ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Liver fat quantification at 0.55 T enabled by locally low-rank enforced deep learning reconstruction.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variable flip angle T1 mapping for quantitative liver imaging at 0.55 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Liver fat quantification at 0.55 T enabled by locally low-rank enforced deep learning reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe emergence of new medications for fatty liver conditions has increased the need for reliable and widely available assessment of MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Whereas low-field MRI presents a promising solution, its utilization is challenging due to the low SNR. This work aims to enhance SNR and enable precise PDFF quantification at low-field MRI using a novel locally low-rank deep learning-based (LLR-DL) reconstruction.
methodsLLR-DL alternates between regularized SENSE and a neural network (U-Net) throughout several iterations, operating on complex-valued data. The network processes the spectral projection onto singular value bases, which are computed on local patches across the echoes dimension. The output of the network is recast into the basis of the original echoes and used as a prior for the following iteration. The final echoes are processed by a multi-echo Dixon algorithm. Two different protocols were proposed for imaging at 0.55 T. An iron-and-fat phantom and 10 volunteers were scanned on both 0.55 and 1.5 T systems. Linear regression, t-statistics, and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted.
resultsLLR-DL achieved significantly improved image quality compared to the conventional reconstruction technique, with a 32.7% increase in peak SNR and a 25% improvement in structural similarity index. PDFF repeatability was 2.33% in phantoms (0% to 100%) and 0.79% in vivo (3% to 18%), with narrow cross-field strength limits of agreement below 1.67% in phantoms and 1.75% in vivo.
conclusionAn LLR-DL reconstruction was developed and investigated to enable precise PDFF quantification at 0.55 T and improve consistency with 1.5 T results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.