ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Evaluating the effectiveness of distortion self-correction for CEST-EPI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of distortion self-correction for CEST-EPI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEPI is a fast acquisition sequence, but suffers from geometric distortion because of B
methodsCEST MRI usually requires B
resultsDISC-CEST-EPI showed higher SSIM and spatial consistency compared to CEST-EPI when using CEST-rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement as a reference in vitro and in vivo at 3 T. For in vivo experiments at 11.7 T, SSIM values of amide proton transfer and relayed nuclear Overhauser effects maps of DISC-CEST-EPI were slightly higher than CEST-EPI and comparable with field-mapping and top-up.
conclusionDISC-CEST-EPI can correct the distortion in CEST-EPI at 3 T, leading to improved SSIM and CEST quantification. This approach has the potential to enhance image quality and improve diagnostic accuracy for single-shot CEST-EPI at especially low-field MRI. However, the performance of DISC-CEST-EPI is limited at 11.7 T, and further advancements are necessary to enhance its functionality at ultra-high fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.