Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883858›Full record

ArticleVeterinary ophthalmology2025

Ocular Abnormalities in 127 Cats Presented for Companion Animal Eye Registry (CAER) Examination in the United States and Canada.

Emma C Collins, Kathryn A Diehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma C CollinsDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4860-7490
Kathryn A DiehlDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9539-6965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo investigate the prevalence and clinical appearance of ocular abnormalities in a US and Canadian population of cats registered with the Companion Animal Eye Registry (CAER) between 2013 and 2023.

methodsAll complete (131) feline CAER exam forms from 2013 to 2023 in the OFA database, were reviewed. Available pedigrees of cats included in this study were also investigated. The central tendencies and dispersion data were reported.

resultsThe population consisted of 113 Bengal, six British Shorthair, two each Maine Coon, and Norwegian Forest, and one each Domestic Shorthair, Ragamuffin, Siberian, and Sphynx cats. Four cats had serial CAER examinations performed. Twenty-two (20%) Bengal cats had normal ophthalmic exams, and 91 (80%) had abnormalities noted. Eighty-one (72%) of the Bengal cats had cataract(s) noted, of which the characteristics varied widely. DISCUSSION: Suggestive of a possible hereditary basis, there was a high prevalence of young Bengal cats presented for CAER examinations between 2013 and 20233 that had functionally incidental cataracts that were expected to be essentially nonprogressive. Most of the noted feline cataracts were bilateral, symmetric, punctate or incipient, and nuclear or posterior. Very minimal pedigree information received supported a possible hereditary basis of cataracts among the British Shorthair cats, but was insufficient to confirm this or apply to the entire study population.

Indexed as

CataractCat DiseasesEye AbnormalitiesEye DiseasesAnimalsCanadaCatsFemaleMalePedigreePrevalenceRegistriesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40883858
PMCPMC12488531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.