ArticleBioData mining2025
Improving classification on imbalanced genomic data via KDE-based synthetic sampling.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized talent cultivation and academic prediction framework for higher education based on the HA-GNN-LSTM architecture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-cohort Analysis Reveals Microbiome Signatures Associated with Drug Response in New-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Class imbalance poses a serious challenge in biomedical machine learning, particularly in genomics, where datasets are characterized by extremely high dimensionality and very limited sample sizes. In such settings, standard classifiers tend to favor the majority class, leading to biased predictions - an especially problematic issue in clinical diagnostics where rare conditions must not be overlooked. In this study, we introduce a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE)-based oversampling approach to rebalance imbalanced genomic datasets by generating synthetic minority class samples. Unlike conventional methods such as SMOTE, KDE estimates the global probability distribution of the minority class and resamples accordingly, avoiding local interpolation pitfalls. We evaluate our method on 15 real-world genomic datasets using three classifiers -Naïve Bayes, Decision Trees, and Random Forests- and compare it to SMOTE and baseline training. Experimental results demonstrate that KDE oversampling consistently improves classification performance, especially in metrics robust to imbalance, such as AUC of the IMCP curve. Notably, KDE achieves superior results in tree-based models while dramatically simplifying the sampling process. This approach offers a statistically grounded and effective solution for balancing genomic datasets, with strong potential for improving fairness and accuracy in high-stakes medical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.