ArticleHuman genomics2025
Integrative single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis reveals the landscape of T cell mitotic catastrophe associated genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-93-5p suppresses esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression and immune escape through targeting PD-L1.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Single-cell RNA-seq combined with bulk RNA-seq analysis identifies necroptosis-related genes as therapeutic targets for periodontitis.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitotic catastrophe (MC) is a well-recognized endogenous mechanism of tumor cell death, characterized as a delayed cell death process associated with aberrant mitosis. However, its prognostic significance in the context of intratumoral heterogeneity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains largely unexplored.
methodsWe performed an in-depth analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from ESCC obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. MC scores for individual cells were calculated using the AddModuleScore function, and T cell specific gene modules were identified via the high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis (hdWGCNA) framework. To further elucidate the developmental trajectories and intercellular interactions of T cells, pseudotime analysis and cell-cell communication inference were conducted. A prognostic risk model was then constructed using three machine learning algorithms combined with multivariate Cox regression analysis. Following risk stratification, we performed immune infiltration profiling, drug sensitivity analysis, and molecular docking to comprehensively assess the functional implications of the risk model in ESCC. Based on preliminary results from quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting (WB), we selected the hub gene SLF2 for functional validation using wound healing, Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, Transwell, and colony formation assays.
resultsBased on T cell mitotic catastrophe associated genes (MCAGs) and utilizing machine learning algorithms, we established a robust prognostic risk model for ESCC. The model demonstrated excellent stratification capability in predicting patient outcomes and effectively revealed the heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and drug sensitivity. Furthermore, functional experiments confirmed that knockdown of the hub gene SLF2 significantly inhibited the migration, invasion, and proliferation of ESCC cells.
conclusionThe prognostic model based on MCAGs we developed serves as an effective tool for predicting outcomes in ESCC.T cell-specific MCAGs drive intratumoral heterogeneity in ESCC, serving as potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.