Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883812›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Engaging in purposeful patient and public involvement with young people living with obesity: recommendations from the ARROWS residential weekend.

Elysa Ioannou, Megan Garside, Kath Sharman, Lucie Nield, Karen Coulman, Claire Woodward, Lousia Ells, Catherine Homer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elysa IoannouSchool of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK. e.ioannou@shu.ac.uk.
Megan GarsideSchool of Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Kath SharmanSHINE, Sheffield, UK.
Lucie NieldSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Karen CoulmanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Claire WoodwardAdvanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Lousia EllsObesity Institute, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Catherine HomerSchool of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme 158453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ENHANCE (Evaluating the NHs engLANd Complications of Excess Weight Services for Children and Young People) study is a national evaluation of the Tier 3 complications of excess weight (CEW) services for children and young people living with obesity. Living with obesity can be linked to wider complex physical and mental health challenges, so it is crucial to incorporate the voice of those with lived experience to inform the evaluation. The value of involving patients and members of the public in research is recognised, however there are limited resources around how to meaningfully involve children and young people living with obesity in research, as well as a lack of practical guidance around delivery and impact.

methodsThis article details the novel residential approach (including classroom sessions and teambuilding exercises) implemented in the ENHANCE evaluation to better engage young people and their families in the research. The aim was to build relationships, trust and confidence between attendees, and to learn from their lived experiences to inform the development of the evaluation. After the residential, attendees completed evaluation forms and de-brief sessions.

resultsEight young people, seven parents, one carer and six researchers attended a residential weekend in October 2024. The weekend included one overnight stay and a range of research and team building activities. Based on feedback from all attendees, the residential had a positive impact on families and helped to improve the evaluation. Feedback from families developed recommendations for designing residentials as part of study.

conclusionThis paper reports the process of designing the residential weekend, important considerations for delivery and the impact on young people, parents and carers with lived experience and the researchers. Advice and recommendations are provided to support other researchers to develop strong, innovative and purposeful patient and public involvement in their research.

Indexed as

Children and young peopleEvaluationLived experienceMethodsObesityPatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID40883812
PMCPMC12395812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.