ArticleBMC research notes2025
Task sharing and teamwork: clinician preferences for alcohol screening and brief interventions in cardiology.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate clinicians' preferences for alcohol screening and brief interventions in clinical cardiology settings.
resultsA total of 664 cardiology clinicians responded to a cross-sectional survey (30.9% response rate), including 55.1% nurses, 21.4% assistant nurses, 18.8% doctors, and 4.7% other clinical staff. Among these participants, 87.5% indicated that patients should be screened for alcohol use on cardiology wards, 79.8% in outpatient clinics, 49.1% in emergency departments, and 45.9% on coronary care units. Doctors and nurses were the preferred professions to be responsible for screening across all clinical contexts, while fewer respondents indicated that assistant nurses or physiotherapists should be responsible for screening (p < .001). Most participants (85.2%) indicated that patients should be screened in more than one clinical context and 84.6% indicated that more than one profession should be responsible for alcohol screening. Clinicians' preferred modality for assessing alcohol use was verbal screening (92% of participants), followed by questionnaires (53.5%), digital tools (28.5%), and alcohol biomarkers (22.1%, p < .001). Just over half of participants (58%) indicated that they would like to attend training on brief interventions. Findings suggest that task sharing, teamwork, and training may be effective strategies for implementation of alcohol screening and brief interventions in clinical cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.