Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883779›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

The cream-skimming behaviors of tertiary hospitals under medical alliances: evidence from China.

Zixuan Peng, Xu Chen, Peter C Coyte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zixuan PengSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xu ChenZhejiang Lab Research Center for Intelligent Society and Governance, Kechuang Road, Zhongtai Street, Yuhang district, Hangzhou, China. cx19961225@sjtu.edu.cn.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Southeast University 4025002402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile previous studies have delved into the formation and development of medical alliances in China, there has been limited focus on investigating inequity in the referral rates and the quality of care received provided to patients with experience of referral and those without under the introduction of medical alliances. This study explored: (1) inequity in the odds of being referred to healthcare institutions within medical alliances; and (2) inequity in the quality of care received between the referred and non-referred patients.

methodsThis study employed a dataset comprising 440,950 individuals who had at least one outpatient visit at healthcare facilities in Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province, China from January 1, 2020 to September 24, 2021. Quality of outpatient care was measured by the odds of having seven-day all-cause follow-up encounters to any healthcare institution. Binary regression models combined with random effects were constructed to examine inequity in the referral rates and the quality of care received. A set of sensitivity analyses were conducted to check the robustness of study findings.

resultsThis study has three key findings. First, outpatients' insurance status, rather than their specific diseases and health conditions, was identified the most significant determinant driving healthcare institutions' referral decisions. Compared with outpatients covered by public health insurance programs, those without such coverage were more likely to be referred by tertiary hospitals to primary care facilities (coefficient = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.56-2.11) while being less likely to be referred by primary care facilities to tertiary hospitals (coefficient = -2.00; 95% CI: -3.08 - -0.92). Second, the referred outpatients received poorer quality of care, as indicated by higher odds of having all-cause follow-up encounters within seven days at any healthcare institution, compared to those non-referred outpatients. Third, outpatients with chronic diseases and public health insurance coverage not only experienced higher referral rates but poorer quality of outpatient care after being referred from tertiary hospitals to primary care facilities, compared to their counterparts.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that tertiary hospitals "siphoned-off" outpatients with public health insurance coverage from primary care facilities. Outpatients who were older, were male, with chronic diseases, and with public health insurance coverage were more likely to experience not only higher referral rates but poorer quality of outpatient care after being referred from tertiary hospitals to primary care facilities. Tailored policies are required to protect and compensate the most vulnerable population groups.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHealthcare DisparitiesInsurance PoolsPrimary Health CareTertiary Care CentersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansChinaIntegrated delivery systemQuality of health careReferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID40883779
PMCPMC12395773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.