ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
In vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of orbifloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrbifloxacin is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic developed for veterinary use in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, as well as respiratory tract infections. This study aimed to define the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and target exposures associated with antibacterial activity, thereby providing a rational framework for the development and optimization of orbifloxacin dosing regimens in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections.
resultsThe PK profiles and PK/PD relationship of orbifloxacin against S. aureus were investigated using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model with multiple dosing regimens. Orbifloxacin exhibited a short-duration post-antibiotic effect (PAE; 0.12–2.45 h) and a longer post-antibiotic sub-MIC effect (PA-SME; 2.13–5.29 h) against S. aureus. The dose-response analysis indicated that the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio over 24 h (AUC24h/MIC) was a strong PK/PD index predictive of antibacterial efficacy (R² >0.98). AUC24h/MIC targets of 33.78–37.79 h, 53.30–61.56 h, 88.59–98.35 h, and 179.43–217.47 h were required to achieve bacteriostatic, 1-log10, 2-log10, and 3-log10 bacterial reductions, respectively.
conclusionsThe results confirm that AUC24h/MIC is an appropriate PK/PD index for predicting antibacterial efficacy and establish target exposure values required to achieve various levels of bacterial kill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.