ReviewConflict and health2025
Reproductive health risks of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in humanitarian settings of Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver 70% of women and girls face heightened risks of sexual and reproductive health in conflict zones where reproductive health care is often neglected. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the epidemiological evidences of reproductive health risks of internal migrants in Ethiopia.
methodsDifferent data bases (CINHAL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, Google scholar and PubMed central) were accessed. Observational Studies conducted in English language were included as per the predetermined inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of reproductive health risks was determined using a random effects model. PRISMA and Systematic Review Guidelines from the Center for Reviews and Dissemination recommendation were followed in the review. Random effect model with I
resultsWe found 324 studies on the databases searched and only eleven studies with 9976 individuals met the criteria of inclusion. The overall pooled magnitude of reproductive health risks in this study is 45.8% (95% CI: 35.6, 56.1). Nearly half of the studies were conducted in Amhara region. Gender based violence is the most frequently reported reproductive health risk. Premarital sex, early marriage and unmet need for contraceptives, abortion, sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancy were reported. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Reproductive health risks among Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) are frequent in all age groups of women, adolescent girls and boys. However, limited number of primary evidences is found to be the major bottleneck to summarize this review. Therefore, the government, non-governmental organizations and researchers with any responsible stockholders should give an appropriate attention to have precise and tangible data on the burden, extent of the problems and survivor population in need of sexual and reproductive health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.