ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction and intramyocardial hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe assessed the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
methodsIn this study, 116 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) underwent direct PCI intervention, admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and January 2021 were selected. Based on the presence of intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH), they were divided into the IMH group and the non-IMH group. There were 46 cases in the IMH group and 70 cases in the non-IMH group. All patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for detection. CMR was used to detect IMH and non-IMH infarction sites. Cardiac indicators of IMH and non-IMH were compared using CMR and echocardiography (ECHO). The diagnostic efficacy of MRI in patients with AMI who had myocardial hemorrhage was compared by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsThe incidence of infarction sites was significantly higher in the IMH group than in the non-IMH group (all P < 0.05); myocardial detection results revealed a significantly higher incidence of ventricular aneurysm and pericardial fluid inclusion in the IMH group than in the non-IMH group (all P < 0.05); CMR evaluation revealed that the infarction size/left ventricular (IS/LV) volume percentage, patients with microvascular obstruction (MVO), and MVO/LV volume percentage were significantly higher in the IMH group than in the non-IMH group (all P < 0.05); global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in the IMH group were significantly lower than those in the non-IMH group (all P < 0.05); was both groups underwent echocardiography after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The results indicated a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDd) and IS/LV volume percentage in the IMH group compared to the non-IMH group (all P < 0.05); the area under the ROC curve of MRI for patients with AMI who had intramyocardial hemorrhage was 0.869, with high specificity and sensitivity; the sensitivity was 87.00, and the specificity was 85.00.
conclusionMRI can detect myocardial hemorrhage in patients with AMI after PCI, which suggests significant clinical diagnostic value and is worthy of utilization in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.