ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
Pulse wave-driven machine learning for the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery calcification (CAC) represents a major cardiovascular risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis. Given that radial artery pulse waveforms can reflect vascular status, this study aimed to evaluate their utility in the non-invasive assessment of CAC severity.
methods58 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis were enrolled. CAC severity was assessed using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and classified into four groups based on Agatston scores: no calcification (0), mild (1-100), moderate (101-400), and severe (> 400). Radial artery pulse waveforms were recorded before, hourly during, and after hemodialysis. Key features were extracted based on morphological differences among groups. Statistical inter-group comparisons and intra-group trend analyses were performed. A gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model was trained to classify CAC severity using waveform features.
resultsClear morphological differences were observed among the four CAC groups. The non-calcified group showed a distinct main wave followed by identifiable tidal waves. With increasing CAC severity, the tidal waves became progressively attenuated and less distinguishable, resulting in a smoother overall waveform, particularly in the severe calcification group. Pulse waveform features exhibited significant variation across CAC groups and over the hemodialysis process, including parameters related to waveform morphology, descending limb, complexity and distribution, mean value, and full-process stereoscopic pulse wave features. The GBDT model demonstrated robust and consistent performance, with an average accuracy of 84.1% and a macro-AUC of 0.962 in fivefold cross-validation, and comparable results (83.9% accuracy, 0.961 macro-AUC) on the independent test set. Notably, the model performed particularly well in identifying Severe Calcification cases.
conclusionsRadial artery pulse wave analysis may serve as a non-invasive adjunct for assessing CAC severity in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.