ArticleBMC medical education2025
Perceptions, challenges, and opportunities of qualitative research among inexperienced medical academics.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specialist Rehabilitation Providers' Experiences With an Online Self-Compassion Course: Reflexive Thematic Analysis.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- From graft survival to lived experience: a new research agenda in transplant medicine.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Mechanism of career resilience formation during the role transition of medical interns: a grounded theory study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough qualitative research is vital to healthcare, it remains underused in medical academia.This study therefore aims to examine in depth the perceptions of medical faculty academics without prior experience in conducting qualitative research, the challenges they face, and the potential contributions of these methods to health research.
methodsThe research is based on a descriptive qualitative study conducted with twelve faculty members specialising in various medical disciplines in three different provinces in Türkiye. Participants were selected using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling methods to ensure a diverse and relevant sample. Face-to-face and Zoom interviews were carried out using structured interview techniques, and data collection continued until data saturation was achieved. The interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the thematic analysis method. The study followed the "Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research" (COREQ) checklist to ensure comprehensive reporting of the qualitative research process.
resultsAcademics acknowledge the significant value of qualitative research in the field of health; however, they are unable to use these methods effectively due to problems such as a lack of practical experience, limited institutional support, and inadequate training programs.Participants also pointed out that they required targeted mentoring and hands-on training to address these issues. Some participants expressed concerns about the time-intensive nature of qualitative studies, which often conflicts with their existing professional responsibilities. Others emphasised the lack of recognition and incentives for qualitative research within institutional policies, further discouraging engagement. Despite these barriers, several participants also highlighted the complementary nature of qualitative and quantitative methods, particularly in addressing complex health problems.
conclusionsIntegrating qualitative methodologies into medical faculties can support a deeper understanding of complex health problems. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced hands-on training and stronger institutional support to enable inexperienced academics to engage more effectively with qualitative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.