ArticleBMC women's health2025
Negative experiences of breastfeeding beyond the infancy age of one year in public - a deductive content analysis of a cross-sectional global sample.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global recommendations of continuing breastfeeding for two years and beyond are not being realised. Barriers to breastfeeding beyond the infancy age of one year continue to be seen globally despite the recognition that facilitating it could prevent 823,000 child and 98,000 parent deaths every year. The visibility of breastfeeding in public, particularly for those who continue to breastfeed, is thought to be reducing and this in turn impacts public acceptability. However, research exploring women's experiences breastfeeding in public typically focuses on newborns. Therefore, this study explores negative experiences of continuing breastfeeding, between the ages of 1 to < 2 years, in a global sample of participants.
methodsA cross-sectional design via an online self-completed questionnaire was adopted to collect data from women, at one point in time, who had experience of breastfeeding a child between the ages of 1-2 years. Participants who had experienced a negative response were asked to share their experiences in a free text question. A content analysis was adopted to explore the information conveyed by the participants through the conceptualising of condensed broad category descriptions.
resultsThere were 2,562 women who had a negative experience of breastfeeding in public places, 1,674 from five continents (Europe 994, America 948, Asia 51, Australia 161, Africa 20, Unknown 12) shared their experience. The findings present four categories: Unsolicited Opinion (56%), Judgemental (39%), Indecent Act (16%) and, Prohibited (7%). Commonly there were experiences of unwanted advice or being shamed and stigmatised to undermine breastfeeding practice. More zealous public reactions, such as implying child abuse, sexualising breastfeeding, or expressing shock and disgust were less common. The least likely to occur were experiences of being told to refrain from, move away or cover up.
conclusionsThe findings reaffirmed that there is a wider social stigma experienced by women breastfeeding beyond infancy in public. This highlights that women who continue to breastfeed are being shamed and blamed for their breastfeeding choices. More efforts are needed to address social and cultural challenges, with an increase in wider knowledge to support breastfeeding beyond infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.