ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Cognitive disability among older adults in Botswana: prevalence, trends, and sociodemographic determinants from cross-sectional data.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subjective Perceptions and Conceptualisations of Ageing and Disability in Ghana: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment is a critical issue among older adults, especially as populations age and demands on healthcare systems increase. In Botswana, the growing older adult population and the rising chronic diseases prevalence highlight the need for focused research on cognitive disability trends and their socio-demographic influences. By analysing demographic data and examining socio-demographic and health-related factors associated with cognitive disability, this research seeks to provide an in-depth understanding of the trajectory of cognitive disability within the ageing demographic in Botswana.
methodsThis study analysed self-reported cognitive disability trends among older adults aged 65 + in Botswana using data from the 2017 Botswana Demographic Survey (BDS) and the 2022 Population and Housing Census (PHC). Disability prevalence was measured using the Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) questions. Bivariate analyses assessed prevalence and trends across demographic groups, and logistic regression models examined socio-demographic and health factors associated with cognitive disability.
resultsThe prevalence of self-reported cognitive disability in Botswana increased substantially over a five-year period, rising from 6.4% in 2017 to 22.2% in 2022-an increase of 15.8%. This upward trend was consistent across all sociodemographic indicators examined. The most rapid rise was observed among adults aged 80 years and older. In the 2022 data, several factors were significantly associated with higher odds of cognitive disability, including advancing age, female gender, residence in rural areas, unemployment, and the presence of physical health conditions (p < 0.05 for all associations).
conclusionThis study demonstrates a substantial and consistent increase in the prevalence of self-reported cognitive disability among older adults in Botswana between 2017 and 2022. This sharp rise likely reflects a combination of measurement differences, changing cultural attitudes, real epidemiological shifts associated with an ageing population and rising non-communicable diseases, and possibly the broader impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced cognitive health interventions, improved data quality, and continued monitoring to address the growing burden of cognitive disability in Botswana's ageing society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.