ArticleBMC medical education2025
Educational use of patient-specific 3D-printed models in dental operative procedures: enhancing clinical training through technology.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of 3D-Printed and Banana Model for Suture and Biopsy Training in Dental Education: A Randomised Controlled Trial.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Trial
- A low cost silicone mandibular model for suturing skills training among undergraduate medical students: development and comparative evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThree-dimensional (3D) printing technology has revolutionized medical and dental education by enabling patient-specific surgical simulations. This study examined postgraduate students' perceptions of using patient-specific 3D-printed technology in hands-on training.
methodsA structured training program at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran, involved 24 postgraduate periodontics and implantology students. Participants practiced surgical techniques on 3D-printed mandibular and maxillary models derived from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. A validated perceptions questionnaire, supported by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), assessed students' experiences across two key dimensions: Educational Impact and Technological Adoption.
resultsStudents reported high satisfaction with the models, citing enhanced understanding of surgical procedures, improved technical skills, and increased confidence in clinical application. A vast majority of participants (mean score: 8.38 ± 0.82) reported significant improvements in procedural comprehension and hands-on skill acquisition. EFA confirmed the questionnaire's validity and revealed two critical dimensions-Educational Impact (53.09%) and Technological Adoption (12.02%)-explaining a cumulative variance of 65.11%. Reliability analysis demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92 and 0.76). While students overwhelmingly endorsed the models' effectiveness in bridging theoretical knowledge and clinical practice, some noted limitations in tactile realism for incision training.
conclusionPatient-specific 3D-printed models effectively bridge the gap between theoretical learning and clinical practice in dental education. They offer a realistic, risk-free training environment that enhances students' perceived understanding and confidence in surgical procedures. While challenges such as cost and material optimization remain, integrating 3D printing into dental curricula is a promising step toward modernizing surgical education by combining technological innovation with artistic anatomical design-what we describe as 'transferring art and technology' into clinical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.