Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Ultrasound-guided modified versus conventional serratus anterior plane block as a preemptive analgesic for unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05661253 (Ultrasound Guided Modified Versus Conventional Serratus Anterior Plane Block as a Preemptive Analgesia for Unilateral Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound Guided Modified Versus Conventional Serratus Anterior Plane Block as a Preemptive Analgesia for Unilateral Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVarious approaches to serratus anterior plane (SAP) block have been discussed in the literature. The present study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and postoperative pulmonary function recovery of modified serratus anterior plane block (MSAP) and conventional serratus anterior plane block (CSAP) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
methodsA total of 99 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into three equal groups: a control group (C group) that received no block, a CSAP group that received preoperative conventional serratus anterior plane block, and an MSAP group that received preoperative modified serratus anterior plane block. The primary outcome was the first 24-hour tramadol consumption. The secondary outcomes were first-time-to-rescue analgesia, postoperative visual analogue score (VAS), postoperative respiratory function, and perioperative hemodynamics.
resultsThe lowest tramadol consumption and longest time to first rescue analgesia were observed in the MSAP group. The postoperative VAS score at 2, 4, and 6 h was significantly greater in the control group, but it was comparable between the two block groups. At 8 h, the VAS score was the lowest in the MSAP group. At 12, 16, and 24 h, the VAS scores were comparable among the three groups. The MSAP group presented the best respiratory function during the first postoperative 8 h. Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were similar in both block groups but were greater in the control group during the intraoperative period.
conclusionThe modified serratus anterior plane block is more efficient than the conventional serratus anterior plane block at reducing opioid consumption, prolonging rescue analgesic time, and improving pulmonary function recovery in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
trial registrationThis clinical trial was approved by the Zagazig University Institutional Review Board (IRB #10060/30-10-2022), was first submitted to clinical trials.gov on 1/12/2022 and was subsequently registered retrospectively on 22/12/2022 (NCT05661253). The first research participant was enrolled on 2/12/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.