ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal retinal functional evaluation using full-field electroretinography in New Zealand white and Dutch Belted rabbits with aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation optoretinography for functional imaging of mouse photoreceptors.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroretinography (ERG) is pivotal in elucidating retinal function, yet investigations into the temporal dynamics of ERG signals in New Zealand White (NZW) and Dutch-belted (DB) rabbits remain scarce. This study presents a longitudinal assessment of retinal function in both NZW and DB strains. ERG recordings were conducted on four NZW and four DB rabbits at 2, 7, 15, and 24 months of age, encompassing both dark-adapted and light-adapted protocols at each time point. Quantitative analyses included assessment of a- and b-wave amplitudes, implicit times, and photopic flicker responses. Results revealed consistently stronger a- and b-wave amplitudes in NZW rabbits compared to DB rabbits across all time points. These stronger ERG responses likely result from increased effective light exposure at the photoreceptor level in NZW rabbits, rather than indicating intrinsic differences in retinal sensitivity. Over time, NZW rabbits showed a decline in visual function of the cone and postreceptoral systems, with the rod system less affected. In contrast, the visual function of DB rabbits initially improved at an early stage, followed by a slight decline after 15 months. The differences between the two strains may be attributed to the varying speeds of retinal maturation, melanin's absorption of light, and its protective effect against light-induced retinal damage. This dataset underscores the differential retinal characteristics between NZW and DB rabbits, shedding light on their distinct functional profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.