Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883553›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insights into molecular mechanisms driving salt tolerance in soybean.

Rajat Pruthi, Chanderkant Chaudhary, Jyoti Sharma, Prabhat Rana, Ravi Kiran Reddy Kondi, Jonathan Richards, Henry T Nguyen, Prasanta Kumar Subudhi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Salt Tolerance in Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rajat PruthiSchool of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Chanderkant ChaudharySchool of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Jyoti SharmaDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Prabhat RanaSchool of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Ravi Kiran Reddy KondiSchool of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Jonathan RichardsDepartment of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Henry T NguyenDivision of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MS, 65211, USA.
Prasanta Kumar SubudhiSchool of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. psubudhi@agcenter.lsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0512-9076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salinity limits the productivity of many crops, including soybean. This study investigated the molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance by comparing the transcriptomic responses to salt stress between a recently identified salt-tolerant (PI 561363) and a salt-sensitive genotype (PI 601984). Leaf tissues were collected at 0 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after exposure to 150 mM NaCl for RNA sequencing. The tolerant genotype exhibited higher chlorophyll content and lower levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and peroxidase (POX) activity compared to the sensitive genotype under salt stress. The highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was identified at 48 h, followed by 6 h and 24 h in both genotypes. The tolerant genotype showed 1,807, 786, and 4,561 DEGs at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h, respectively, while the sensitive genotype had 1,465, 681, and 5,479 DEGs. Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment in processes such as ion transport, ethylene signaling, suberin biosynthesis, lipid biosynthesis, and metabolism. Key candidate genes such as GmHAK5, GmGSTU19, GmKUP6, GmTDT, GmCHX20a, GmOST1/SnRK2.6, GmERF98, and GmERF1 were identified as crucial for stress signaling, ion homeostasis, and cellular integrity under saline stress conditions. These results offer insights into the molecular processes that drive salt tolerance in soybeans and highlight potential targets for breeding more resilient soybean varieties.

Indexed as

Glycine maxSalt ToleranceTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypePlant LeavesPlant ProteinsSalt StressPlant ProteinsCandidate genesGlycine maxLipid peroxidationRNA-Seq, GmSALT3Salt tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40883553
PMCPMC12397409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.