ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Decision-making experience for second donation in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors: a descriptive qualitative study.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of technology-based psychosocial interventions on quality of life and psychological outcomes in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- How prevalent is fear of cancer recurrence beyond 5 years: a systematic review of validated assessments across tumour types.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- "I felt as though my life had come to an end": lived experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Nepal.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Relationships among fear of progression, avoidance coping, and post-traumatic growth in adult patients with lymphoma: A multi-center cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is often the most effective treatment option for patients experiencing graft failure or disease relapse following a first round of allo-HSCT. Unfortunately, the consent rate for second donation is insufficient to meet treatment needs worldwide. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the decision-making experience of unrelated donors when considering making a second donation. This research is essential as it could inform the development of interventions to improve the consent rate for second donation.
designThis was a descriptive qualitative study that followed the COREQ checklist.
methodsA total of 16 unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors who completed a second donation were selected by purposive sampling and underwent semi-structured interviews between September and December 2023. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
resultsData analysis yielded four themes and 11 sub-themes: (1) initial reaction (unexpectedness, immediate consent); (2) locked-in dilemma (worried about the outcome of second donation, faced familial pressure, felt morally hijacked); (3) internal impetus (personal value of helping others, kinship tie, self-efficacy from the first donation, positive impact of the first donation), and (4) external reinforcement (pluralistic social support and societal influence).
conclusionsTo improve the consent rate for second donations, it is necessary to implement targeted education and comprehensive support encompassing personal, familial, and social aspects, while ensuring autonomy. Our analysis suggested that optimizing the first donation experience and fostering positive feedback beliefs are crucial factors when considering a second donation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: By clarifying the decision-making experiences of unrelated donors, this research informs strategies to improve second donation consent rates. Enhanced donor retention directly expands life-saving options for patients with disease relapse or graft failure, potentially improving survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40883546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.