Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantifying tracking quality during occlusion with an integrated gaze metric anchored to task performance.

Tuisku Tammi, Jami Pekkanen, Benjamin Ultan Cowley, Otto Lappi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tuisku TammiCognitive Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. tuisku.tammi@helsinki.fi.
Jami PekkanenCognitive Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Benjamin Ultan CowleyCognitive Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Otto LappiCognitive Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Research Council of Finland 318913Research Council of Finland 325694Research Council of Finland 334192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual tracking of moving objects, even when they are temporarily hidden from view, is a fundamental skill for humans. This study examines gaze behavior in an object tracking task with intermittent occlusions, highlighting the role of task goals. Participants tracked an object moving along a linear path with random occlusions, performing a visual discrimination task upon the object's brief reappearance. We analyzed gaze behavior and developed a model to quantify the relationship between gaze dynamics and task performance. The model yields a performance metric that takes into account the full gaze signal, i.e. both smooth pursuit and saccades. We introduce a position- and velocity-integrated tracking quality metric based on these gaze dynamics, providing an objective continuous measure of tracking performance that works also throughout occlusions.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFixation, OcularTask Performance and AnalysisAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40883515
PMCPMC12397211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.