Trial reportScientific reports2025
Randomized clinical trial of photobiomodulation and glass ionomer sealant for hypersensitivity in molar incisor hypomineralization.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05370417 (Photobiomodulation and Glass Ionomer Sealant as Complementary Treatment for Hypersensitivity in Molars With MIH in Children - Protocol for a Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Photobiomodulation and Glass Ionomer Sealant as Complementary Treatment for Hypersensitivity in Molars With MIH in Children - Protocol for a Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Key concepts for clinical management of Molar Incisor Hypomineralization.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of photobiomodulation (PBM) combined with glass ionomer sealant on hypersensitivity, oral hygiene, and sealant retention in molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH). Forty-nine children (6-12 years) with MIH (Grade 3, 4a, or 4b) per MIH-TNI criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: control (n = 25, fluoride toothpaste, sealant with self-curing glass ionomer cement, simulated PBM) and treatment (n = 24, fluoride toothpaste, sealant with self-curing glass ionomer cement, active PBM). Hypersensitivity (SCASS, VAS), oral hygiene (OHI-S), and sealant retention (CCC system) were assessed. Forty-six children completed the study and were evaluated. At all post-baseline time points, the treatment group showed significantly lower VAS and SCASS scores (p < 0.05). OHI-S improved in both groups, with a positive correlation between reduced hypersensitivity and better oral hygiene. Sealant retention was higher in the treatment group after 30 days, with 56.5% of teeth showing complete retention versus 17.4% in the control group (p = 0.002). In the control group, greater hypersensitivity correlated with worse retention. PBM combined with glass ionomer cement reduces hypersensitivity, improves oral hygiene, and enhances sealant retention in MIH-affected molars. The combined treatment provides superior results in hypersensitivity reduction and sealant retention compared to sealant alone, offering a more effective approach for managing MIH.Trial registration: NCT05370417 in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.