ArticleScientific reports2025
IQUP identifies quantitatively unreliable spectra with machine learning for isobaric labeling-based proteomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TMT-Based Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Molecular Mechanism Underlying Quality Deterioration of Refrigerated Northern Pike (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometry‑based proteomics using isobaric labeling technology has become popular for proteomic quantitation. Existing approaches rely on the mechanism of target-decoy search and false discovery rate control to examine whether a peptide-spectrum match (PSM) is utilized for quantitation. However, some PSMs passing the examination may still exhibit high quantitation errors, which can deteriorate the overall quantitation accuracy. We present IQUP, a machine learning-based method to identify quantitatively unreliable PSMs, termed QUPs. PSMs were characterized by 16 spectral and distance-based features for machine learning. Independent test results reveal that the best-performing models for the three datasets achieve accuracies of 0.883-0.966, AUCs of 0.924-0.963, and MCCs of 0.596-0.691. Notably, the distributions of relative errors for QUPs and quantitatively reliable PSMs (QRPs) exhibit significant differences. By using only the predicted QRPs for peptide-level quantitation, the proportions of peptides with larger relative errors decrease significantly, with a range between 15.3 and 83.3% for the three datasets; in the meantime, the proportions of peptides with smaller relative errors increase by 3.1-25.5%. Our experimental results demonstrate that IQUP provides robust performance and strong generalizability across multiple datasets and has great potential in improving proteomic quantitation accuracy at PSM and peptide levels for isobaric labeling experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.