Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

IQUP identifies quantitatively unreliable spectra with machine learning for isobaric labeling-based proteomics.

Yi-Yun Chou, Jing-Chen Yang, Tun-Chu Tsai, Ching-Tai Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi-Yun ChouDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413, Taiwan.
Jing-Chen YangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413, Taiwan.
Tun-Chu TsaiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413, Taiwan.
Ching-Tai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Taipei, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. ctchen@utaipei.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2221-E-468-006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry‑based proteomics using isobaric labeling technology has become popular for proteomic quantitation. Existing approaches rely on the mechanism of target-decoy search and false discovery rate control to examine whether a peptide-spectrum match (PSM) is utilized for quantitation. However, some PSMs passing the examination may still exhibit high quantitation errors, which can deteriorate the overall quantitation accuracy. We present IQUP, a machine learning-based method to identify quantitatively unreliable PSMs, termed QUPs. PSMs were characterized by 16 spectral and distance-based features for machine learning. Independent test results reveal that the best-performing models for the three datasets achieve accuracies of 0.883-0.966, AUCs of 0.924-0.963, and MCCs of 0.596-0.691. Notably, the distributions of relative errors for QUPs and quantitatively reliable PSMs (QRPs) exhibit significant differences. By using only the predicted QRPs for peptide-level quantitation, the proportions of peptides with larger relative errors decrease significantly, with a range between 15.3 and 83.3% for the three datasets; in the meantime, the proportions of peptides with smaller relative errors increase by 3.1-25.5%. Our experimental results demonstrate that IQUP provides robust performance and strong generalizability across multiple datasets and has great potential in improving proteomic quantitation accuracy at PSM and peptide levels for isobaric labeling experiments.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteomicsHumansMass SpectrometryPeptidesPeptidesIsobaric labelingiTRAQMachine learningProteomic quantitationTMT

Identifiers

PMID40883461
PMCPMC12397414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.