ArticleScientific reports2025
Latent profile analysis and influencing factors of cognitive flexibility among Chinese high school students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advancement of research in educational psychology, cognitive flexibility (CF), as a pivotal ability that enables individuals to adapt to complex environments and tackle challenges, has garnered increasing attention from scholars. For high school students, there is a lack of research regarding latent profiles of cognitive flexibility and associated risk factors. To identify latent profiles of cognitive flexibility among high school students and develop targeted interventions. From August to October 2024, 1,014 high school students in Hebi City were surveyed using a comprehensive questionnaire incorporating the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups of CF among students and a binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the associated influencing factors. The optimal cut-off value for grouping was determined by calculating the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under curve. Results show that CF could be divided into 2 classes: class1 moderate-CF group (73.5%) and class2 high-CF group (26.5%). The results of the regression analysis indicated that male was a predictor of the high-CF group (OR = 1.414, 95% CI: 1.034-1.935). The higher aesthetic sensitivity and Proactive Personality Scale scores (OR = 1.774, 95% CI: 1.413-2.228; OR = 1.108, 95% CI: 1.080-1.137) were significantly more likely to be in the high-CF group. Additionally, students with a higher ease of excitation score (OR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.502-0.736) were more likely to belong to the moderate-CF group. Based on the ROC, a cut-off value of 68.5 was established to identify the high-CF group, with sensitivity at 0.862 and specificity at 0.946. It is recommended that educational and mental health interventions focus on individual differences among students to comprehensively enhance cognitive flexibility and regulatory capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.