ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Rethinking suicide related searches and their association with suicide rates, attempts, and self harm hospitalisation.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Search engine ads for suicide prevention: analysis of engagement from Indonesia relative to Australia, the USA, and the medical industry standards.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the relationship between Google search volumes for suicide-related keywords and suicide, attempt, and self-harm hospitalisation rates across three investigations in Indonesia and Australia. While past research suggested a link between suicide-related searches and suicide rates, this study found no consistent association with suicide rates. However, search volumes were positively associated with suicide attempts in Indonesia and self-harm hospitalisations in Australia. Further analysis using the IMV-Model of Suicidal Behaviour showed that searches related to distress were not associated with outcomes, while ideation-related keywords were linked only to attempts. In contrast, searches related to specific suicide methods-reflecting the volitional phase of the IMV-Model-were associated with both attempts and suicides, particularly for high-lethality methods. Limitations include data quality on suicide outcomes, the representativeness of Google Trends, and a focus on only two countries. Overall, search behaviour may reflect attempt risk more than suicide risk, depending on keyword category.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.