ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
An artificial intelligence cloud platform for OCT-based retinal anomalies screening system in real clinical environments.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Eye Disease-Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The evolving role of artificial intelligence in optimizing treatment and patient selection in diabetic macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- CSAG-DETR: a lightweight detector for accurate weed detection in sugar beet fields under complex field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Peripheral retinal degenerations: multimodal imaging-guided risk stratification and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Millions of individuals worldwide suffer from retinal anomalies, which can lead to irreversible vision loss. However, the number of ophthalmologists is highly mismatched with the population base in China, especially in many rural and underdeveloped towns. To tackle these challenges, this paper developed an Artificial Intelligence Cloud Platform for OCT-based Retinal Anomalies Screening (AI-PORAS), which is capable of detecting 15 retinal anomalies in OCT images to enhance remote diagnostic efficiency. AI-PORAS has been trained, validated, and deployed to 207 medical institutions in 29 provinces in China. The validation on 165,384 eyes with 3,551,959 OCT B-scan slices, AI-PORAS achieved an average accuracy of 93.16%, an AUC of 93.64%, a FPR of 6.82%, a FNR of 7.87%, matching the average performance level of attending ophthalmologists. Additionally, Statistical analysis of the 116,717 remotely diagnosed patients provided insightful guidance for healthcare decision-making and the development of tailored treatment plans.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.