Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883410›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative study by FEM of different liners of a transfemoral amputated lower limb.

Aichouba Adda Cherif, Moulgada Abdelmadjid, Zagane Mohammed El Sallah, Benouis Ali, Murat Yaylacı, Sahli Abderahmane, Mehmet Emin Özdemir, Ayberk Dizdar, Ecren Uzun Yaylacı, Yılmaz Güvercin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aichouba Adda CherifDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tiaret, 14000, Tiaret, Algeria.
Moulgada AbdelmadjidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tiaret, 14000, Tiaret, Algeria.
Zagane Mohammed El SallahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tiaret, 14000, Tiaret, Algeria.
Benouis AliLaboratory Mechanics Physics of Materials (LMPM), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sidi Bel Abbes, BP 89, 22000, City Ben Mhidi, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria.
Murat YaylacıBiomedical Engineering MSc Program, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Turkey. murat.yaylaci@erdogan.edu.tr.
Sahli AbderahmaneLaboratory Mechanics Physics of Materials (LMPM), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sidi Bel Abbes, BP 89, 22000, City Ben Mhidi, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria.
Mehmet Emin ÖzdemirDepartment of Civil Engineering, Cankiri Karatekin University, 18100, Çankırı, Turkey.
Ayberk DizdarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kocaeli University, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Ecren Uzun YaylacıFaculty of Fisheries, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100, Rize, Turkey.
Yılmaz GüvercinDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, 61250, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

Recep Tayyip Erdogan Üniversitesi FBI-2024-1589Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation 02025007001575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of prosthetic liners significantly influences stress distribution, soft tissue protection, and the overall efficiency of the prosthetic. While extensive research has been conducted on liner materials, the impact of liner thickness (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm) on biomechanical response remains underexplored. This study utilizes finite element analysis in Abaqus to investigate how liner material (Gel vs. Silicone) and thickness affect contact pressure (CPRESS), maximum principal strain (Le. Max), shear stress (CSHEAR1), and vertical displacement (U3) at the residual limb-liner interface. A three-dimensional numerical model was developed to simulate stress transmission and displacement behavior under physiological loading conditions. The results demonstrate that liner thickness plays a critical role in modulating pressure distribution and mechanical stability, with Gel providing superior flexibility and shock absorption, whereas Silicone offers enhanced structural integrity. At a thickness of 2 mm, the highest pressure of 0.4656 MPa is recorded. When the thickness is increased to 4 mm, the pressure decreases to 0.4153 MPa, reflecting a reduction of approximately 10.8%. Further increasing the thickness to 6 mm results in a pressure drop of 0.3825 MPa, corresponding to a total reduction of 17.9%. These findings provide quantitative insights into stress attenuation mechanisms, contributing to the optimization of prosthetic liner design for improved clinical outcomes in lower-limb amputees.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsFemurLower ExtremityAmputation, SurgicalAmputeesBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansPressureProsthesis DesignSiliconesStress, MechanicalSiliconesContact pressureDisplacementFinite element analysisProsthetic linerShear stress

Identifiers

PMID40883410
PMCPMC12397369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.