ArticleScientific reports2025
Leveraging advanced ensemble learning techniques for methane uptake prediction in metal organic frameworks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the diagnostic performance of machine learning algorithms for differentiating iron deficiency anemia and thalassemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy and environmental policy agencies have been looking for suitable adsorbent materials to promote the use of adsorbed natural gas (ANG). Various candidate adsorbent materials have been developed and tested for methane adsorption. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have shown a promising performance in methane adsorption and are of particular interest due to their power in adsorption and separation of gases, chemical tunability, ease of synthesis, and high surface area. Accurate calculation of the theoretical adsorption potential of methane in MOFs and its validation through experiments brings about significant challenges. A growing number of researchers are adopting soft-computing approaches, particularly machine-learning (ML) algorithms, to tackle these challenges. Although ML algorithms have been applied in assessing methane uptake capacity of MOFs, the majority of these efforts have primarily focused on feature selection or the criteria for MOF screening. This communication, however, mainly focuses on the implementation of ensemble-based ML paradigms, including gradient boosting (GBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and gradient boosting with categorical features support (CatBoost) in accurate estimation of methane uptake capacity of experimentally synthesized MOFs based on some readily available features including temperature, pressure, and MOF's pore volume and surface area, for the first time. To this end, a database containing almost 2600 datapoints was attained. The results indicated the high performance of the XGBoost algorithm in estimating the methane uptake capacity of MOFs with a correlation coefficient (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.