ArticleScientific reports2025
Tracking metal presence in cannabis vaping products from source to inhalation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Procedural Challenges in the Analysis of Toxic Metals in Electronic Cannabinoid Delivery System Aerosols Produced for Vaping Cannabinoids.Journal of testing and evaluation · 2026Article
- Cannabinoid Vaping Products: Regulation, Composition, Toxicological Effects, and Emerging Research.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Review
- Risk assessment of metals measured in regulated Canadian dried cannabis and cannabis vaping products: case study and perspectives.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaping cannabis liquids is a convenient method of cannabis consumption, and is considered to be a less harmful alternative to smoking cannabis. However, vaping cannabis carries its own health risks, with many uncertainties, especially concerning the presence of metal particles in vape liquids. The heterogeneous distribution of these particles within the liquid matrix poses analytical challenges in measurement reproducibility. In this study, total metals analysis was performed on five samples from six different legal Canadian cannabis vape liquid products. The results indicated that metals from the vaping device components, cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) significantly contributed to within-batch variability. In contrast, all analyzed metals showed significant variability among tested products. Single-particle ICP-MS detected metal particles of aluminum (Al), Co, chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), Ni, tin (Sn), and Zn in the vape liquids. To assess potential consumer exposure, cannabis cartridges were vaped using a vaping machine and the resulting aerosol was analyzed. Although the number of detected emitted particles was below the limit of quantitation, all samples produced aerosols containing metal particles of Co, Cr, Ni, lead (Pb), Sn, and Zn. Further analysis using SEM-EDS on the emptied cartridges showed cracking on the connector pin of an unused device, suggesting a potential source of contamination during use and storage. The elemental composition of the metal components in the cartridges matched the detected particles, providing strong evidence that cannabis vape liquids are contaminated by the metal components of vaping devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.