ArticleScientific reports2025
DCNN models with post-hoc interpretability for the automated detection of glossitis and OSCC on the tongue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models with Grad-CAM visualization for the automated classification with interpretability of tongue conditions-specifically glossitis and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)-using clinical tongue photographs, with a focus on their potential for early detection and telemedicine-based diagnostics. A total of 652 tongue images were categorized into normal control (n = 294), glossitis (n = 340), and OSCC (n = 17). Four pretrained DCNN architectures (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet152) were fine-tuned using transfer learning. Model interpretability was enhanced via Grad-CAM and sparsity analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using AUROC, with subgroup analysis by age, sex, and image segmentation strategy. For glossitis classification, VGG16 (AUROC = 0.8428, 95% CI 0.7757-0.9100) and VGG19 (AUROC = 0.8639, 95% CI 0.7988-0.9170) performed strongly, while the ensemble of VGG16 and VGG19 achieved the best result (AUROC = 0.8731, 95% CI 0.8072-0.9298). OSCC detection showed near-perfect performance across all models, with VGG19 and ResNet152 achieving AUROC = 1.0000 and VGG16 reaching AUROC = 0.9902 (95% CI 0.9707-1.0000). Diagnostic performance did not differ significantly by age (P = 0.3052) or sex (P = 0.4531), and whole-image classification outperformed patch-wise segmentation (P = 0.7440). DCNN models with Grad-CAM demonstrated robust performance in classifying glossitis and OSCC from tongue photographs with interpretability. The results highlight the potential of AI-driven tongue diagnosis as a valuable tool for remote healthcare, promoting early detection and expanding access to oral health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.