Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883377›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Personalized health monitoring using explainable AI: bridging trust in predictive healthcare.

M Sree Vani, Rayapati Venkata Sudhakar, A Mahendar, Sukanya Ledalla, Marepalli Radha, M Sunitha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Sree VaniDepartment of CSE, BVRIT Hyderabad College of Engineering, For Women, 500090, Hyderabad, India.
Rayapati Venkata SudhakarDepartment of Computer science and Engineering, Geethanjali college of Engineering and Technology, Medchal District,Cheeryal, Hyderabad, 500043, Telangana, India. rayapati1113@gmail.com.
A MahendarDepartment of CSE (Date Science), CMR Technical Campus, kandlakoya, Hyderabad, Telangana 501401, India.
Sukanya LedallaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Bowrampet, Hyderabad, 500043, Telangana, India.
Marepalli RadhaCSE Department, CVR College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
M SunithaCSE, Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI has propelled the potential for moving toward personalized health and early prediction of diseases. Unfortunately, a significant limitation of many of these deep learning models is that they are not interpretable, restricting their clinical utility and undermining trust by clinicians. However, all existing methods are non-informative because they report generic or post-hoc explanations, and few or none support patient-specific, accurate, individualized patient-level explanations. Furthermore, existing approaches are often restricted to static, limited-domain datasets and are not generalizable across various healthcare scenarios. To tackle these problems, we propose a new deep learning approach called PersonalCareNet for personalized health monitoring based on the MIMIC-III clinical dataset. Our system jointly models convolutional neural networks with attention (CHARMS) and employs SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) to obtain global and patient-specific model interpretability. We believe the model, enabled to leverage many clinical features, would offer clinically interpretable insights into the contribution of features while supporting real-time risk prediction, thus increasing transparency and instilling clinically-oriented trust in the model. We provide an extensive evaluation that shows PersonalCareNet achieves 97.86% accuracy, exceeding multiple notable SoTA healthcare risk prediction models. Explainability at Both Local and Global Level The framework offers explainability at local (using various matrix heatmaps for diagnosing models, such as force plots, SHAP summary visualizations, and confusion matrix-based diagnostics) and also at a global level through feature importance plots and Top-N list visualizations. As a result, we show quantitative results, demonstrating that much of the improvement can be achieved without paying a high price for interpretability. We have proposed a cost-effective and systematic approach as an AI-based platform that is scalable, accurate, transparent, and interpretable for critical care and personalized diagnostics. PersonalCareNet, by filling the void between performance and interpretability, promises a significant advancement in the field of reliable and clinically validated predictive healthcare AI. The design allows for additional extension to multiple data types and real-time deployment at the edge, creating a broader impact and adaptability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePrecision MedicineDeep LearningDelivery of Health CareHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTrustClinical decision supportDeep learningExplainable AIPersonalized health monitoringSHAP interpretability

Identifiers

PMID40883377
PMCPMC12397250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.