ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative investigation of free radical scavenging and cyclic voltammetric analyses to evaluate the antioxidant potential of selective green vegetables extracts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging in vitro bioactivities and in silico insights of Rubia cordifolia L. (Rubiaceae) leaf extracts for therapeutic applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant Activity, and Neuroprotective Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Phytochemical and Biological Evaluation ofInternational journal of analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- In Vitro and In Silico Evaluation of a Novel Multifunctional Cyclic Peptide with Antioxidant, Tyrosinase-Inhibitory, and Extracellular Matrix-Modulating Activities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antioxidant properties of medicinal plants are often assessed using chemical assays; however, electrochemical techniques like cyclic voltammetry offer complementary insights. This study explores the antioxidant potential of crude ethanol extracts and solvent fractions from Ipomoea aquatica and Colocasia esculenta using both DPPH radical scavenging assay and electrochemical cyclic voltammetry. Phytochemical screening identified key secondary metabolites in both plants. Antioxidant activity was quantified using the DPPH assay, and electrochemical behavior was assessed by cyclic voltammetry to detect redox-active compounds. Phytochemical analysis revealed flavonoids, phenols, tannins, reducing sugars, and glycosides in both plants, while C. esculenta also contained terpenoids, alkaloids, and xanthoprotein. The DPPH assay showed IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.