ArticleScientific reports2025
Ergonomic assessment of a multi-joint actuated lower extremity exoskeleton to assist dynamic lifting and carrying tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An uncertainty-aware ergonomic risk assessment framework using Interval-Valued Fermatean Fuzzy Sets and hybrid MCDM.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Intelligent Pressurized Thigh Band for Muscular Assistance and Multi-Mode Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The proof-of-concept study for a hip and knee joint actuated exoskeleton developed for repetitive manual lifting and carrying tasks is investigated. Fifteen participants completed the study which involved two laboratory manual handling tasks of (1) lifting a box weighing 9.5 kg (repeated in three trials as a standalone task) and (2) lifting and carrying same box over a distance (repeated in three trials as a single combined task), with and without the use of the exoskeleton suit. Monopolar surface EMG sensors are utilized to capture participants muscular activity from two quadricep femoris muscles (i.e., the vastus medialis and rectus femoris) and a calf muscle (i.e., gastrocnemius) of the lower extremity. After each task repetition (trial), participants are asked to rate their perceived musculoskeletal effort on a scale of 0 to 100 (or 100%) where ‘100’ represents the highest possible participant effort. We determine the ‘onset’ of fatigue for each participant based on the trial at which fatigue was first experienced. The exoskeleton is found to reduce average muscular activity of the vastus medialis (30–60%), rectus femoris (30–38%), and gastrocnemius muscles (40–58%). Participants’ average rating of their lower-limb musculoskeletal effort when assisted by exoskeleton is found to be significantly less (26.9%) than their rating without the exoskeleton. However, subjective rating of fatigue differs significantly among the participants. These findings adds performance evaluation data for powered lower-extremity exoskeleton for strength augmentation in lifting and carrying works. Future studies should provide further insight into its potential use for prevention of cumulative trauma disorders of the lower-extremity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.