ArticleScientific reports2025
Critical factors analysis of student-athletes learning training contradiction via AHP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Legalization dilemma and solution of China's professional sports league governance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop a model that identifies the factors influencing the Learning Training Contradiction (LTC) among student-athletes. The goal is to provide a theoretical foundation for educators, administrators, and researchers to effectively address this issue. Initial indicators affecting LTC were identified from existing literature. An optimized system of indicators was established based on evaluations from 14 experts in relevant fields. This system includes four criterion-level factors, 15 factor-level elements, and 52 alternative-level measures. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), pairwise comparisons were conducted to determine the weight values of each indicator relative to the decision-making objective. AHP results revealed significant variations in the importance of factors contributing to LTC among student-athletes. Based on the weight distribution, this study suggests that resolving LTC in the future requires a collaborative mechanism involving multiple stakeholders to maintain a balance between learning and training, ultimately promoting the holistic development of youth athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.