Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883303›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Drought recovery in plants triggers a cell-state-specific immune activation.

Natanella Illouz-Eliaz, Jingting Yu, Joseph Swift, Kathryn Lande, Bruce Jow, Lia Partida-Garcia, Za Khai Tuang, Travis A Lee, Adi Yaaran, Rosa Gomez-Castanon and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Single-cell insights into plant growth, adaptation, and evolution.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  5. The transcription factorHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Natanella Illouz-EliazPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jingting YuThe Razavi Newman Integrative Genomics and Bioinformatics Core Facility, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1182-3680
Joseph SwiftPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kathryn LandeThe Razavi Newman Integrative Genomics and Bioinformatics Core Facility, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bruce JowPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lia Partida-GarciaPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Za Khai TuangDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7508-2640
Travis A LeePlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8352-8956
Adi YaaranInstitute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Rosa Gomez-CastanonPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-002X
William OwensGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Chynna R BowmanThe Waitt Advanced Biphotonics Core Facility, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Emma OsgoodGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Joseph R NeryPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0153-5659
Tatsuya NoboriPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1773-3361
Yotam ZaitInstitute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Saul BurdmanDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9544-7371
Joseph R EckerPlant Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA. ecker@salk.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-5895

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Alan Saghatelian · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
San Diego Nathan Shock CenterP30AG068635 · NIA · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SHARPEE, TATYANA O. · 2020 to 2024
$6.0M
Reversing the Irreversible: Reshaping Plant Growth upon Recovery from Severe StressK99GM154136 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Natanella Eliaz · 2025 to 2026
$248k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NIA NIH HHS P30 AG068635NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM154136U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) K99GM154136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All organisms experience stress as an inevitable part of life, from single-celled microorganisms to complex multicellular beings. The ability to recover from stress is a fundamental trait that determines the overall resilience of an organism, yet stress recovery is understudied. To investigate how plants recover from drought, we examine a fine-scale time series of RNA sequencing starting 15 min after rehydration following moderate drought. We reveal that drought recovery is a rapid process involving the activation of thousands of recovery-specific genes. To capture these rapid recovery responses in different Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana) leaf cell types, we perform a single-nucleus transcriptome analysis at the onset of drought recovery, identifying a cell type-specific transcriptional state developing independently across cell types. To further validate the cell-type specific transcriptional changes observed during drought recovery, we employ spatial transcriptomics using multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH), revealing anatomical localization of recovery-induced gene expression programs across Arabidopsis leaf tissues. Furthermore, we reveal a recovery-induced activation of the immune system that occurs autonomously, and which enhances pathogen resistance in vivo in A. thaliana, wild tomato (Solanum pennellii) and domesticated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. M82). Since rehydration promotes microbial proliferation and thereby increases the risk of infection, the activation of drought recovery-induced immunity may be crucial for plant survival in natural environments. These findings indicate that drought recovery coincides with a preventive defense response, unraveling the complex regulatory mechanisms that facilitate stress recovery in different plant cell types.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisDroughtsPlant ImmunityDrought ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePlant LeavesStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40883303
PMCPMC12397292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.