ArticlePsycho-oncology2025
Sun-Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour in Western Saudi Arabia: Implications for Psycho-Oncology Prevention Services.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Patients with Keratoconus in an Optometry Clinic in the Palestinian Authority.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Article
- Research on the role and mechanisms of Cystatin 6 in disease pathosis and development.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Sun-Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour in Western Saudi Arabia: Implications for Psycho-Oncology Prevention Services.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelanoma, a highly aggressive skin cancer, is strongly linked to ultraviolet (UV) exposure. Despite high UV levels in Saudi Arabia, public awareness and adherence to melanoma preventive behaviours remain underexplored. This study assessed knowledge (factual accuracy), attitudes, and sun-protective practices among adults in the western region of Saudi Arabia, investigating demographic and gender-specific differences.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted from April to May 2024, recruiting 553 participants aged 18-80 years through convenience sampling. A validated 46-item questionnaire assessed melanoma knowledge, risk perception, sun exposure patterns, and adherence to preventive behaviours. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to analyse differences based on age, gender, education, employment, and healthcare affiliation.
resultsModerate awareness of melanoma was observed (mean = 2.28, 5-point Likert scale), with 73.2% of participants recognising sunlight as a risk factor for skin cancer. However, misconceptions were widespread, including beliefs that short-term sun exposure is harmless (36%) and that sunscreen is unnecessary on cloudy days (43.8%). Females and younger participants (18-35 years) demonstrated significantly higher knowledge (p < 0.001 and p = 0.036, respectively) and risk perception; however, adherence to sun-protective behaviours (e.g., sunscreen re-application, protective clothing) was suboptimal across all groups (mean = 2.67). Education level influenced awareness (p = 0.031), but did not impact behaviour.
conclusionDespite moderate awareness, significant knowledge gaps and a knowledge-action gap hinder melanoma prevention in this high-UV region. Culturally tailored interventions targeting misconceptions and behavioural barriers, particularly among males and individuals with lower educational attainment, are essential. These findings inform the development of evidence-based strategies to reduce melanoma risk in Saudi Arabia and similar high-UV settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.