Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40883182›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2025

Awake reactivation is not a uniform process.

Amir Tal, Eitan Schechtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amir TalPsychology Department and Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. Electronic address: eitans@uci.edu.

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories are consolidated during restful wakefulness, but the mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. We argue that wakeful reactivation is not monolithic: it encompasses non-conscious and conscious processes with varying levels of elaboration and diverging consequences. Refining reactivation as a concept may help avoid conflicting results on wake consolidation.

Indexed as

BrainMemory ConsolidationWakefulnessAnimalsConsciousnessHumansconsolidationmemoryreactivation

Identifiers

PMID40883182
PMCPMC12478275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.