ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2025
Smart Glasses for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immersive Technologies for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Smart Glasses for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Explanatory Mixed Methods Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify and synthesize peer-reviewed literature on smart glasses for older adults with cognitive impairment. The review focused on (1) the technology and equipment used, (2) the specific tasks smart glasses are designed to support, (3) feasibility outcomes, when measured, and (4) the quality of the reviewed articles.
designScoping review. SETTING AND
participantsOlder adults with cognitive impairment.
methodsA research librarian conducted a comprehensive search across 8 databases to identify peer-reviewed studies that investigated the use of smart glasses for older adults with cognitive impairment. Two authors independently used Covidence to review articles for extraction and organization.
resultsOur search yielded 414 articles and 13 were included for data extraction and appraisal. All included studies were rated as low quality. Seven studies focused on commercially available smart glasses and 6 focused on early-stage prototypes of smart glasses. Only 5 studies involved hands-on testing with older adults, and just one study exclusively involved participants with cognitive impairment. The main purpose of the smart glasses included assisting older adults with daily tasks, recognizing faces, aiding in navigation, and helping care partners locate or monitor individuals with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: More rigorous studies are needed to test smart glasses among older adults with cognitive impairment and the literature does not reflect the recent advancements in smart glasses technology. Future smart glasses research should include more interdisciplinary teams, utilize user-centered design frameworks, and obtain long-term feasibility and effectiveness data among larger samples of older adults with cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.