ArticleActa biomaterialia2025
Impact of scaffold material choice on osteosarcoma phenotype and drug responses in 3D.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Matrix micro/nano-topography drives oncogenic signaling and drug response in a 3D osteosarcoma model.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Bifunctional scaffolds: strategic bridges coordinating osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Scaffolds Mimicking the Tumor Microenvironment for In Vitro Malignancy Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomaterials-based 3D models have emerged as new cancer research tools for studying osteosarcoma (OS). However, the impact of scaffold material choice on OS phenotype and drug responses in 3D remains largely unknown, as previous studies used different biomaterials as scaffolds without direct comparison. In this study, we systematically compared four biomaterials: Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), Gelatin microribbons (Gel µRB), Collagen I hydrogel (Col1), and Poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA). All have previously been applied for either 3D OS culture or bone tissue engineering. To mimic the mineral component of bone, hydroxyapatite mineral nanoparticles (HAnp) were incorporated into all scaffolds. We assessed key clinically relevant OS phenotypes including cell proliferation, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and responses to multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Our results demonstrate that scaffold material significantly influences OS phenotype and drug resistance. Notably, PLGA results in the lowest cell proliferation, GelMA promotes drug resistance and tumor ECM deposition, and Gel µRB better mimics OS signaling of orthotopic tumor xenografts in vivo. The findings from this comparative study underscore the impact of scaffold choice on OS phenotype and drug response. It also provides valuable insights for guiding the selection of appropriate scaffold materials to better mimic the desirable OS phenotype to advance OS therapeutic discovery. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Osteosarcoma (OS), a highly aggressive bone cancer, has seen a stagnant survival rate for over three decades. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comparing four widely used bone tissue engineering scaffolds for 3D OS culture. Unlike previous studies, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of how scaffold choice influences OS proliferation, signaling, extracellular matrix deposition, and drug resistance. These findings underscore the critical role of biomaterials choice in modulating OS behavior and will guide the choice of 3D scaffolds for more effective OS disease modeling and improving therapeutic discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.