ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2025
Validation and Prospective Testing of a High-Sensitivity, Quantitative Analytic Assay for HER2 on Histopathology Slides.
Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative immunohistochemistry and the use of cellular calibrators for HER2 receptor number determination.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Redefining HER2 in Breast Cancer: From Conventional Positivity to Low and Ultralow in the New Era of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent approval of antibody-drug conjugates targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (such as trastuzumab deruxtecan [T-DXd]) has led to challenges for the immunohistochemical (IHC) companion diagnostic test because the test was optimized for gene-amplified levels of HER2. Here, we develop and validate an objective test for low-level HER2 expression toward more accurate selection of patients for T-DXd. We validated the high-sensitivity HER2 assay using a mix of the requirements for an IHC assay and that of a ligand-binding assay. Then, we prospectively tested it on 316 core biopsy specimens received by the Yale Pathology Laboratories from August 2022 to August 2023. Using a 40-case breast cancer tissue validation set, we find very high accuracy and precision with a coefficient of variation <10% and define a reportable range for the assay in attomoles per square millimeter. These prospective cases not only show the dynamic range of HER2 expression but also the discordance of Yale Pathology Labs staff pathologist scores with quantitative measurements, especially in the low range of HER2. We find that 6% of the cohort was below the limit of detection of this more sensitive assay, whereas 71% of the IHC 0 cases were above the limit of quantification. Efforts are underway to determine a possible threshold expression level required for T-DXd response. In summary, this assay validation study provides a method for accurate, objective measurement of HER2 and has the potential to improve selection of patients for T-DXd or similarly targeted antibody-drug conjugate therapies in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.