Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40882217›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Decoding HIV Discourse on Social Media: Large-Scale Analysis of 191,972 Tweets Using Machine Learning, Topic Modeling, and Temporal Analysis.

Xiangming Zhan, Meijia Song, Cho Hee Shrader, Chad E Forbes, Angel B Algarin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiangming ZhanEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N 3rd St, Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, United States, 1 (330) 272-4294.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2969-5196
Meijia SongSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9438-3716
Cho Hee ShraderDivision of Nursing Science, School of Nursing, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3500-8507
Chad E ForbesEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N 3rd St, Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, United States, 1 (330) 272-4294.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-0695
Angel B AlgarinEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 N 3rd St, Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, United States, 1 (330) 272-4294.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3518-8245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HIV remains a global challenge, with stigma, financial constraints, and psychosocial barriers preventing people living with HIV from accessing health care services, driving them to seek information and support on social media. Despite the growing role of digital platforms in health communication, existing research often narrowly focuses on specific HIV-related topics rather than offering a broader landscape of thematic patterns. In addition, much of the existing research lacks large-scale analysis and predominantly predates COVID-19 and the platform's transition to X (formerly known as Twitter), limiting our understanding of the comprehensive, dynamic, and postpandemic HIV-related discourse. Objective: This study aims to (1) observe the dominant themes in current HIV-related social media discourse, (2) explore similarities and differences between theory-driven (eg, literature-informed predetermined categories) and data-driven themes (eg, unsupervised Latent Dirichlet Allocation [LDA] without previous categorization), and (3) examine how emotional responses and temporal patterns influence the dissemination of HIV-related content. Methods: We analyzed 191,972 tweets collected between June 2023 and August 2024 using an integrated analytical framework. This approach combined: (1) supervised machine learning for text classification, (2) comparative topic modeling with both theory-driven and data-driven LDA to identify thematic patterns, (3) sentiment analysis using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) and the NRC Emotion Lexicon to examine emotional dimensions, and (4) temporal trend analysis to track engagement patterns. Results: Theory-driven themes revealed that information and education content constituted the majority of HIV-related discourse (120,985/191,972, 63.02%), followed by opinions and commentary (23,863/191,972, 12.43%), and personal experiences and stories (19,672/191,972, 10.25%). The data-driven approach identified 8 distinct themes, some of which shared similarities with aspects from the theory-driven approach, while others were unique. Temporal analysis revealed 2 different engagement patterns: official awareness campaigns like World AIDS Day generated delayed peak engagement through top-down information sharing, while community-driven events like National HIV Testing Day showed immediate user engagement through peer-to-peer interactions. Conclusions: HIV-related social media discourse on X reflects the dominance of informational content, the emergence of prevention as a distinct thematic focus, and the varying effectiveness of different timing patterns in HIV-related messaging. These findings suggest that effective HIV communication strategies can integrate medical information with community perspectives, maintain balanced content focus, and strategically time messages to maximize engagement. These insights provide valuable guidance for developing digital outreach strategies that better connect healthcare services with vulnerable populations in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMachine LearningSocial MediaCOVID-19HumansHIV preventionmachine learningpublic health informaticssocial mediatemporal analysistopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID40882217
PMCPMC12396797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.