Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40882172›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2025

Features of Prodromal Parkinson Disease and Dopaminergic Neurotransmission in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Lana Chahine, Andrea L Rosso, Ian Troidl, Mary Ganguli, Anne B Newman, Brian J Lopresti, Kelsey Allen, Sarah Kolibash Royse, Sherri Mosovsky, Emma Ratner and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lana ChahineDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-7196
Andrea L RossoDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Ian TroidlDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Mary GanguliDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Anne B NewmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-1150
Brian J LoprestiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-0203
Kelsey AllenUniversity of Pittsburgh, PA.
Sarah Kolibash RoyseDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Sherri MosovskyDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Emma RatnerDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Gayatri DholakiaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-5575-5799
Nicolaas I BohnenDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and.
Caterina RosanoDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-1506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesParkinson disease (PD) pathology begins years before clinical diagnosis. Identifying individuals in this prodromal period is of high priority because they are candidates for clinical trials. Several characteristics of the PD prodrome have been described, but many are nonspecific. Among community-dwelling older adults unselected for PD risk, their relationship to objective measures of nigrostriatal dopaminergic nerve terminal density has not been studied in vivo. We determined prevalence of PD risk factors and prodromal signs/symptoms in community-dwelling older adults, examined their relationship with dopaminergic nerve terminal density, and explored prevalence and distribution of other possible prodromal features.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study of community-dwelling older adults without diagnosed neurologic disorders in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Participants were assessed for 5 PD risk markers and ≤8 prodromal signs/symptoms, and underwent dopaminergic imaging with dihydrotetrabenazine ([

resultsA total of 231 participants were included, mean (SD) age 75.1 (4.5) years, 94 (40.7%) men. More than 1 prodromal sign/symptom was present in 131 (56.7%), with cognitive deficit being the most common. pPD was present in 18 (7.8%) of the sample. Compared with the not pPD group, the pPD group had lower mean age-adjusted and sex-adjusted predicted [ DISCUSSION: Prodromal nonmotor and motor signs/symptoms of PD are common in community-dwelling older adults. Increased probability of prodromal PD is associated with decreased dopaminergic nerve terminal density of the posterior putamen that is also more asymmetric. Our findings support the use of composite measures of prodromal features to identify individuals at the population level who may be at risk for PD.

Indexed as

DopamineParkinson DiseaseProdromal SymptomsSynaptic TransmissionAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePositron-Emission TomographyRisk FactorsSubstantia NigraTetrabenazinedihydrotetrabenazineDopamineTetrabenazine

Identifiers

PMID40882172
PMCPMC12396634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.